Science!
Re: Science!
So, basically the common knowledge about how to make maple syrup is entirely wrong.
Short version: sap flows up from the roots, not down from the top, so you could cap and pump saplings on a maple farm rather than having to stick a tap in a 300 year old tree out in the woods and get exactly the same sap.
Short version: sap flows up from the roots, not down from the top, so you could cap and pump saplings on a maple farm rather than having to stick a tap in a 300 year old tree out in the woods and get exactly the same sap.
Re: Science!
Trees are tapped at the bottom because it's within arm's reach, not to catch sap flowing down. Up here kids are made familiar with maple syrup production early in elementary school, and it's more or less traditional to make yearly visits to production sites ("érablières", which are in the country but by no means off in the wild woods) to sample the goods with friends and family; the only new thing I gathered from that article is that it's possible to pump saplings without killing them, though it doesn't really go in detail about the effect on their growth.
- Mongrel
- Posts: 21397
- Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 6:28 pm
- Location: There's winners and there's losers // And I'm south of that line
Re: Science!
Oh man, going to an érablière is the best (we got that here in school too).
Re: Science!
Ha, ironically, one such trip in second grade soured me on maple taffy ever since. It was so good, and I had too much, and now the sight of it makes me gag.
Re: Science!
Hey, I remember going on field trips to the sugar bush. Sometimes they'd do that thing where they drip hot syrup onto a snowbank and everybody got a piece.
- nosimpleway
- Posts: 4729
- Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 7:31 pm
Re: Science!
I'd laugh at the stereotype in action of all the Canadians talking about how awesome their maple syrup is, except my wife got one of her Tumblrfriends to send us a case of the stuff and it's kind of the most fantastic thing. I can't laugh at you guys if you're right, dammit!
- Mongrel
- Posts: 21397
- Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 6:28 pm
- Location: There's winners and there's losers // And I'm south of that line
Re: Science!
Büge wrote:Hey, I remember going on field trips to the sugar bush. Sometimes they'd do that thing where they drip hot syrup onto a snowbank and everybody got a piece.
Oh yeah, fresh maple syrup on clean snow is the bestestestest.
Re: Science!
Ha, that's what I meant by maple taffy, "tire sur la neige". I wish I could still agree with you.
The complexity of aromas in quality syrup is really something. According to variables such as soil composition, regional weather patterns, tree age/pedigree, and boiling time, it's not unreasonable to say the spectrum of nuances approaches the variety found in wines. I guess that's why the idea of pumping sap from tight rows of saplings doesn't sit well with me on principle. Even up here it's all too easy to find syrup with a flavor that's not worth its calories.
nosimpleway wrote:I'd laugh at the stereotype in action of all the Canadians talking about how awesome their maple syrup is, except my wife got one of her Tumblrfriends to send us a case of the stuff and it's kind of the most fantastic thing. I can't laugh at you guys if you're right, dammit!
The complexity of aromas in quality syrup is really something. According to variables such as soil composition, regional weather patterns, tree age/pedigree, and boiling time, it's not unreasonable to say the spectrum of nuances approaches the variety found in wines. I guess that's why the idea of pumping sap from tight rows of saplings doesn't sit well with me on principle. Even up here it's all too easy to find syrup with a flavor that's not worth its calories.
Re: Science!
Perhaps, but people still make artisanal wines even though $3 bottles of wine exist, and vice-versa. Even if it works out, I can't see the new process completely supplanting the old one.
Re: Science!
Drones are, honestly, fascinating as fuck and have a whole lot of potential positive uses, some of which are neither obvious nor trivial.
It's a pity they're used primarily by governments for killing people, but such is the way of all technology I suppose.
(Full disclosure: I've been working as a freelance web dev for a company that sells aerial surveillance equipment since late 2008.)
It's a pity they're used primarily by governments for killing people, but such is the way of all technology I suppose.
(Full disclosure: I've been working as a freelance web dev for a company that sells aerial surveillance equipment since late 2008.)
Re: Science!
Your Willy Wonka signature is really distressing in this context.
Re: Science!
Science has produced some pretty good gifs.
Re: Science!
Hey, that is pretty neat!
Re: Science!
Wow. I don't know why no one else has thought to approach it that way.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests